Healthcare Resource Partitioning in India: Mumbai vs. Bihar

Author: Dhanashri Karry

Abstract

This analysis explores the critical role of resource allocation in addressing disparities and fostering balanced development between urban centres and rural regions in India, focusing on Mumbai and Bihar. Mumbai, a major urban hub, benefits from substantial investments in healthcare, education, and infrastructure, while Bihar, a predominantly rural state, struggles with inadequate facilities and limited access to basic services. Key findings reveal significant disparities in healthcare access, education quality, and infrastructure development. The study highlights the need for targeted policies and strategic investments to address the unique challenges of both urban and rural areas, aiming to improve living conditions, healthcare access, and socio-economic opportunities for all residents. By focusing on sustainable development and inclusive policies, it is possible to enhance the quality of life and ensure equitable resource distribution across India.

Biography

Dhanashri Karry is a 10th grader who attends Woodbridge Academy Magnet School. She is deeply interested in the topic of resource allocation disparities between Mumbai and Bihar, two regions in the country of India. This is because medical ethics itself is one of Dhanashri’s keen interests and the contrast between resource allocation between rural and urban areas fueled her determination to explore and address these inequities. In her free time, she likes to run long distances, hike, and practice singing Carnatic music.

Introduction

Resource partitioning, or the distribution of resources among various regions and populations, is crucial for balanced development and addressing disparities. The stark contrast between urban centres like Mumbai and rural regions like Bihar in India shows the challenges and complexities involved in resource allocation. Examining how resources are distributed and utilised in these areas provides valuable insights into broader socio-economic dynamics and persistent inequalities that affect millions [1]. In this analysis, we will delve into the various aspects of resource allocation in Mumbai and Bihar, exploring their impacts on healthcare, education, infrastructure, and overall quality of life.

Daily Life Struggles

In Mumbai, daily life struggles are particularly acute in slum areas. The high cost of living forces many to reside in slums with poor living conditions, lacking basic amenities like clean water, sanitation, and electricity [2]. Pollution, including air and water quality, is a major concern, and rapid urbanisation has led to environmental degradation, affecting the quality of life. Residents of slums face major obstacles to accessing basic services and amenities [3]. Women, especially in lower socioeconomic groups, face significant barriers in accessing education, healthcare, and employment opportunities. Gender-based violence and discrimination further exacerbate these challenges [4]. The high population density and rapid urbanisation have led to strain on infrastructure and resources, resulting in poor living conditions for many residents [4]. The disparity in living conditions between affluent areas and slums underscores the need for targeted policies and investments to address the unmet needs of the urban poor [5].

In Bihar, daily life struggles are primarily in rural areas, where inadequate infrastructure and services pose challenges to daily life. Traditional practices and social norms restrict women's access to education, healthcare, and employment. Gender-based violence is also a significant issue [6]. High poverty levels limit access to basic necessities like food, clean water, and healthcare. Many families struggle to afford even primary education for their children. Poor infrastructure and limited transportation options further restrict mobility and access to markets and services, which shows the need for targeted policies and investments to address these challenges [7].

Importance of Resource Allocation in Urban and Rural Areas

Effective resource allocation is essential for sustainable development. Urban areas rely on it to support infrastructure, healthcare, education, and economic growth. Conversely, rural areas need resources to enhance agricultural productivity, healthcare, education, and connectivity. Disparities in resource allocation between urban and rural regions can lead to unequal growth, perpetuating poverty and limiting opportunities [8].

In urban centres like Mumbai, the focus is on maintaining and improving the complex infrastructure that supports its large population and economic activities. This includes investing in advanced healthcare facilities, efficient public transportation systems, and high-quality educational institutions [9]. The availability of these resources attracts businesses and skilled workers, driving further economic growth. However, the challenges of rapid urbanisation, such as traffic congestion, pollution, and housing shortages, necessitate continuous investment and planning [9].

In contrast, rural areas like Bihar face different challenges that require tailored resource allocation strategies. The primary focus in these areas is on improving agricultural productivity, ensuring access to basic healthcare and education, and developing infrastructure such as roads and electricity supply. The lack of investment in these critical areas can result in poor living standards, limited economic opportunities, and a cycle of poverty [10]. Effective resource allocation in rural areas is essential to improve the quality of life and create opportunities for sustainable development.

Overview of Population, Geographical, Social, Economic, and Traditional Aspects

Mumbai, with a population exceeding 20 million, is one of the most densely populated cities globally [11 ; 12]. Located on India's west coast, it is a major port city with a coastal landscape. Mumbai is a melting pot of cultures, languages, and religions, hosting diverse communities from across India. Known as India's financial capital, it houses the Bombay Stock Exchange and numerous multinational corporations [13]. Its economy is driven by finance, entertainment, textiles, and commerce. Despite its modern outlook, Mumbai retains a rich cultural heritage with festivals, traditional markets, and historic landmarks.

Mumbai’s population density is approximately 20,634 people per square kilometre, leading to significant strain on infrastructure and resources [12]. The city’s economy, driven by sectors such as finance, media, and entertainment, contributes substantially to India’s GDP [14]. The presence of major financial institutions, corporate headquarters, and the Bollywood film industry makes Mumbai a hub of economic activity. However, this economic prosperity coexists with stark disparities, as evidenced by the large slum populations living in areas like Dharavi, where living conditions are harsh and access to basic amenities is limited [15].

In contrast, Bihar has a population of over 100 million, with a lower population density compared to Mumbai, though still high by rural standards [16]. Situated in eastern India, Bihar is landlocked with a predominantly agrarian landscape, characterised by the fertile plains of the Ganges River. The state is socially diverse, with various caste groups and communities. Social stratification and traditional practices remain influential. Bihar’s economy is primarily agricultural, with rice, wheat, and maize as the main crops [17]. Industrialization is minimal, and the state has one of the lowest per capita incomes in India. Bihar also boasts a rich historical and cultural heritage, being home to ancient universities like Nalanda and significant religious sites [18].

Bihar’s population density is around 1,106 people per square kilometre, significantly lower than Mumbai but still dense for a largely rural state [19]. The state’s reliance on agriculture, which employs a significant portion of the population, points out the need for effective resource allocation to improve agricultural productivity and infrastructure [17]. The historical significance of sites like Nalanda University and Bodh Gaya adds a cultural dimension to Bihar’s identity, yet the state faces challenges in translating this heritage into economic growth and development.

Medical Access

Both Mumbai and Bihar face many healthcare challenges due to the inadequate healthcare infrastructure and shortage of doctors and hospital beds. Mumbai boasts a higher number of doctors and hospital beds per capita compared to Bihar. The city has approximately 7 doctors per 1,000 people and around 1.3 hospital beds per 1,000 people [20 ; 21; 22].

Mumbai's healthcare infrastructure includes several renowned public hospitals such as KEM Hospital, Sion Hospital, and JJ Hospital, as well as numerous private hospitals and clinics offering specialised care. This extensive network of healthcare facilities provides a wide range of medical services, from primary care to advanced tertiary care [23].

Bihar, on the other hand, faces a severe shortage of healthcare professionals and facilities. The state has about 1 doctor for every 17,685 people and the number of hospital beds per 1,000 people is one of the lowest ratios in India [24 ; 25 ; 26]. This shortage is particularly acute in rural areas, where primary health centres are often understaffed and lack basic medical equipment. The limited availability of healthcare professionals and facilities significantly impacts the quality of care available to the population, leading to poor health outcomes and high mortality rates [27 ; 28 ; 29].

Resource comparisons

Allocation of Resources in Mumbai

Mumbai benefits from substantial resource allocation due to its economic importance. The healthcare system includes numerous public and private hospitals, specialised medical institutions, and healthcare facilities [30]. Despite this, high population density results in overcrowded hospitals and long waiting times. Significant investments in transportation include an extensive railway network, roads, and public transportation systems like buses and the metro. However, traffic congestion and pollution remain major issues [31]. Mumbai offers a wide range of educational institutions from primary schools to prestigious universities and technical institutes, attracting students from across India and abroad. Real estate in Mumbai is among the most expensive globally, with stark contrasts in living conditions, such as in slum areas like Dharavi, where many lack basic amenities [30 ; 32].

Mumbai’s healthcare infrastructure comprises both public and private sectors. The city hosts premier institutions like Tata Memorial Hospital and Sir J.J. Hospital, providing advanced medical care and attracting patients from across the country [30]. However, the demand for healthcare services far exceeds supply, leading to overcrowded facilities and long waiting times. Public healthcare centres often struggle with inadequate funding and resources, affecting the quality of care provided to the urban poor [30].

Transportation in Mumbai is characterised by an extensive suburban railway network, which is the lifeline of the city. The Mumbai Metro and Monorail projects aim to ease the burden on the railway system and reduce traffic congestion. Despite these efforts, traffic congestion remains a significant issue due to the high number of vehicles and inadequate road infrastructure [30 ; 33]. The city’s real estate market is among the most expensive globally, driven by high demand and limited space. This results in significant disparities in living conditions, with affluent areas boasting luxury apartments and slum areas facing overcrowded and unsanitary conditions [34].

Education in Mumbai is a mixed bag. The city is home to some of India’s most prestigious educational institutions, such as the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Bombay and the University of Mumbai [35]. These institutions attract students from all over India and even abroad. However, there is also a significant disparity in the quality of education between private and public schools. Many public schools, especially those in slum areas, lack basic facilities and struggle with inadequate teaching staff and resources [36].

Allocation of Resources in Bihar

Bihar’s resource allocation reflects its agrarian economy and developmental challenges. The state struggles with inadequate healthcare infrastructure, a shortage of medical professionals, and poorly equipped facilities, particularly in rural areas. While there have been improvements in road connectivity and electricity supply, overall infrastructure development lags behind more urbanised states. Rural areas often lack basic amenities like clean drinking water and sanitation. Despite progress in literacy rates, the quality of education remains a concern, with many schools lacking proper facilities and qualified teachers. Significant resources are allocated to agriculture, with schemes aimed at improving productivity and farmer welfare. However, frequent floods and droughts pose ongoing challenges [37].

The healthcare system in Bihar is characterised by a severe shortage of healthcare professionals and facilities. Rural areas rely heavily on primary health centres, which often lack the necessary equipment and staff to provide adequate care. The state faces a high burden of communicable diseases, maternal and child health issues, and malnutrition. The lack of healthcare infrastructure and medical personnel results in poor health outcomes and a high mortality rate [38].

Infrastructure development in Bihar has seen some progress, with improvements in road connectivity and electrification. However, many rural areas still lack basic amenities such as clean drinking water, sanitation, and a reliable electricity supply. The state’s education system faces significant challenges, with many schools lacking proper facilities and qualified teachers. Efforts to improve literacy rates have yielded some success, but the quality of education remains a concern, particularly in rural areas [39].

Agriculture is the backbone of Bihar’s economy, employing a significant portion of the population [37]. The state allocates substantial resources to agricultural development, with schemes aimed at improving productivity, irrigation, and farmer welfare. However, frequent natural disasters such as floods and droughts pose ongoing challenges, affecting agricultural output and livelihoods. The state’s economy remains largely agrarian, with limited industrialization and job opportunities, contributing to widespread poverty and underdevelopment [38].

Comparison of Healthcare Resource Allocation: Mumbai vs. Bihar

In Mumbai, healthcare facilities are more advanced and numerous, featuring specialised hospitals, a higher number of healthcare professionals, and better medical technology [40]. However, the high population density leads to overcrowded facilities and unequal access to quality care, particularly for the poor [40]. In contrast, Bihar's healthcare system is severely under-resourced, with rural areas often relying on primary health centres that lack adequate equipment and staff [2]. The state faces a high burden of communicable diseases and maternal and child health issues. The lack of infrastructure and medical personnel results in poor healthcare outcomes compared to urban areas like Mumbai [2].

Mumbai’s healthcare system benefits from significant investment and advanced medical technology. The city hosts renowned institutions like Tata Memorial Hospital, known for its cancer treatment, and the Haffkine Institute, specialising in biomedical research. Private hospitals like Lilavati Hospital and Hinduja Hospital offer world-class medical care, attracting patients from across India and abroad. However, the public healthcare system faces significant challenges, with overcrowded hospitals and long waiting times [41]. The high cost of private healthcare services also limits access for low-income populations, leading to disparities in healthcare access and outcomes [42].

In contrast, Bihar’s healthcare system is characterised by a severe shortage of medical professionals and facilities. The state has one of the lowest doctor-to-patient ratios in India, with many rural areas relying on under-resourced primary health centres [24 ; 25]. The lack of infrastructure and medical personnel results in poor healthcare outcomes, with high rates of maternal and child mortality and a significant burden of communicable diseases [43 ; 44]. Efforts to improve healthcare infrastructure have been hampered by inadequate funding and logistical challenges, further exacerbating the disparities between urban and rural healthcare access.

State of Public Health

Mumbai, with its diverse and dense population, faces unique public health challenges. The city's healthcare system is a blend of public and private sectors, offering a wide range of medical services. Public health initiatives in Mumbai have focused on combating infectious diseases, improving maternal and child health, and addressing lifestyle-related illnesses such as diabetes and cardiovascular diseases [45]. Despite these efforts, the high population density and rapid urbanisation have led to overcrowded healthcare facilities and uneven access to services.

In Bihar, public health challenges are primarily driven by inadequate infrastructure, limited resources, and high poverty levels. The state's public health system is underfunded and understaffed, struggling to meet the basic healthcare needs of its population [46]. Bihar has a high prevalence of communicable diseases such as tuberculosis, malaria, and diarrhoea, which are exacerbated by poor sanitation and lack of clean drinking water. Maternal and child health indicators are also poor, with high rates of maternal and infant mortality [47 ; 48].

Demographics and Mortality Rates

Mumbai's population of over 20 million includes a mix of age groups, socioeconomic statuses, and cultural backgrounds. The city has a relatively lower infant mortality rate (IMR) compared to the national average, thanks to better access to maternal and child healthcare services [49]. However, significant disparities exist, with slum areas experiencing higher mortality rates due to poor living conditions, malnutrition, and limited access to healthcare [49]. The life expectancy in Mumbai is relatively high, reflecting better healthcare access and living conditions for a substantial portion of the population [49].

In contrast, Bihar's population of over 100 million is predominantly young, with a significant proportion under the age of 15. The state's IMR is higher than the national average, reflecting substantial challenges in maternal and child healthcare [50]. Factors contributing to high mortality rates in Bihar include inadequate healthcare infrastructure, poor nutrition, high rates of infectious diseases, and lack of access to clean water and sanitation [50 ; 51 ; 52]. The state's life expectancy is lower compared to urban areas like Mumbai, indicating significant health disparities and poor living conditions [52].

Aging Demographics

Mumbai's demographic profile includes a growing ageing population, necessitating increased healthcare resources and services for the elderly. The city has several specialised geriatric care centres and facilities catering to the needs of senior citizens [53]. However, the high cost of private healthcare services and limited availability of affordable public healthcare options pose challenges for low-income elderly residents. The demand for geriatric care is expected to rise as the population ages, highlighting the need for targeted healthcare policies and investments.

In Bihar, the demographic profile is predominantly young, with a smaller proportion of elderly individuals compared to Mumbai. However, the state's healthcare infrastructure is ill-equipped to address the specific needs of the ageing population. There are limited geriatric care facilities, and the overall healthcare system struggles to provide adequate care for the elderly, who often face neglect and inadequate medical attention [54]. The focus of healthcare services in Bihar is primarily on maternal and child health, communicable diseases, and basic healthcare needs, leaving the ageing population underserved [55 ; 56].

Health Care

Public vs. Private Healthcare Sectors

Mumbai's healthcare system is characterised by a robust mix of public and private sectors. The public sector includes large hospitals such as KEM Hospital, Sion Hospital, and JJ Hospital, which provide affordable care to the city's low-income population [57]. Despite these facilities, the public sector is often overwhelmed by the high patient load, leading to overcrowded conditions and long waiting times. Public hospitals in Mumbai play a critical role in providing healthcare services to the city's vulnerable populations, including the residents of the slums and low-income groups [57].

The private sector in Mumbai is well-developed, with numerous hospitals and clinics offering advanced medical services and state-of-the-art technology. Hospitals like Lilavati, Hinduja, and Breach Candy provide high-quality care but are expensive, limiting access to affluent segments of the population [58]. The disparity between public and private healthcare services calls attention to the unequal access to quality healthcare in the city [58]. While the private sector offers advanced medical treatments and better patient amenities, it remains inaccessible to the majority of the population due to high costs.

Bihar's healthcare system is predominantly public, with limited private sector presence. The public sector struggles with inadequate funding, poor infrastructure, and a severe shortage of medical professionals. Primary health centres and district hospitals are the backbone of the state's healthcare system but often lack basic facilities and equipment [58]. The private sector is underdeveloped, with few private hospitals and clinics concentrated mainly in urban areas. This imbalance results in limited access to quality healthcare for the majority of Bihar's population, particularly in rural regions. Efforts to improve healthcare in Bihar often focus on strengthening the public healthcare system, but progress is slow due to systemic challenges and limited resources [59 ; 46 ; 43].

Healthcare Financing and Expenditure

Healthcare financing and expenditure in Mumbai and Bihar reflect the broader economic disparities between the two regions. Mumbai, being a wealthy urban centre, benefits from higher public and private healthcare spending. The Maharashtra state government allocates a significant portion of its budget to healthcare, supporting public hospitals and healthcare programs. Additionally, the city's affluent population and corporate presence contribute to substantial private healthcare spending, enabling investments in advanced medical facilities and technologies [60].

Bihar, on the other hand, allocates a smaller portion of its budget to healthcare, reflecting the state's economic constraints and developmental challenges. The state's per capita healthcare expenditure is one of the lowest in India, resulting in underfunded public healthcare facilities and limited resources for healthcare programs. The central government's health schemes and funding provide some support, but the overall financing remains inadequate to meet the healthcare needs of the population [61].

In Mumbai, the combined public and private healthcare expenditure is significantly higher compared to Bihar. The city's advanced medical facilities, specialised hospitals, and availability of high-quality care reflect the substantial investments in healthcare. In contrast, Bihar's healthcare system struggles with limited funding, poor infrastructure, and inadequate resources, leading to significant disparities in healthcare access and outcomes between the two regions [60].

Unmet  Health Care Needs in Both Regions

Both Mumbai and Bihar face significant unmet healthcare needs, albeit in different contexts. In Mumbai, despite the availability of advanced healthcare facilities, the high patient load leads to long waiting times and inadequate care for many [26]. People residing in slums and low-income groups face barriers to accessing quality healthcare due to overcrowded public hospitals and high costs of private healthcare. In Bihar, the lack of healthcare infrastructure and professionals results in poor health outcomes. Many rural residents travel long distances to access medical care, which is often unaffordable. The quality of education remains poor, with many schools lacking basic facilities. Higher education opportunities are limited, contributing to low literacy and skill levels [38]. Basic infrastructure such as roads, electricity, and sanitation are inadequate in many areas. Frequent natural disasters exacerbate these challenges, disrupting daily life and economic activities [37].

Healthcare Policy and Strategic Initiatives

To address the healthcare disparities between Mumbai and Bihar, it is crucial to implement targeted policies and strategic initiatives. In Mumbai, the focus should be on expanding public healthcare infrastructure, improving the quality of care in public hospitals, and ensuring affordable access to healthcare for all residents. Initiatives to reduce overcrowding in public hospitals, enhance primary healthcare services, and address environmental health concerns such as pollution are essential. Additionally, efforts to improve living conditions in slum areas, including access to clean water, sanitation, and affordable housing, are critical to addressing the broader determinants of health [62 ; 63].

In Bihar, targeted investments in healthcare infrastructure, medical training, and resource allocation are essential to improve healthcare access and outcomes. Strengthening primary healthcare services, expanding the availability of medical professionals in rural areas, and enhancing the quality of care in public hospitals are critical steps. Additionally, addressing the social determinants of health, such as poverty, education, and sanitation, is essential to improving overall health outcomes in the state. Strategic initiatives to enhance maternal and child health services, combat communicable diseases, and improve nutrition and sanitation are vital to addressing the state's healthcare challenges [63 ; 64 ; 65].

Conclusion

The contrast between Mumbai and Bihar in terms of healthcare resource allocation represents the diverse challenges faced by urban and rural India. Mumbai's advanced healthcare infrastructure, higher number of medical professionals, and substantial investments in both public and private sectors provide better healthcare access and outcomes for its population [66]. However, disparities exist, particularly in slum areas where access to quality healthcare remains limited.

Bihar, with its predominantly rural population, faces severe challenges in healthcare resource allocation. The state's inadequate healthcare infrastructure, shortage of medical professionals, and limited funding result in poor health outcomes and significant disparities in access to care [43]. Addressing these disparities requires targeted policies and investments that consider the unique needs and contexts of both regions.

Efforts to improve healthcare in Mumbai should focus on enhancing public healthcare facilities, addressing overcrowding, and ensuring affordable access to quality care for all residents [67]. In Bihar, targeted investments in healthcare infrastructure, medical training, and resource allocation are essential to improve healthcare access and outcomes [68]. Additionally, strengthening public health programs, improving sanitation, and addressing malnutrition are critical to addressing the state's health challenges.

Overall, bridging the healthcare resource gap between Mumbai and Bihar is essential for fostering balanced and inclusive development across India. By focusing on sustainable development, inclusive policies, and collaborative efforts, it is possible to enhance healthcare access and outcomes for millions of people, contributing to the overall progress and prosperity of the nation [69]. Ensuring equitable healthcare resource allocation and addressing the broader determinants of health are critical steps toward achieving health equity and improving the quality of life for all Indians.

Bibliography

Chen, Yiyi, Zhou Yin, and Qiong Xie. “Suggestions to Ameliorate the Inequity in Urban/Rural Allocation of Healthcare Resources in China.” International Journal for Equity in Health 13, no. 1 (May 1, 2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-13-34.

Wendt, Amanda S., Rob Stephenson, Melissa F. Young, Pankaj Verma, Sridhar Srikantiah, Amy Webb-Girard, Carol J. Hogue, Usha Ramakrishnan, and Reynaldo Martorell. “Identifying Bottlenecks in the Iron and Folic Acid Supply Chain in Bihar, India: A Mixed-Methods Study.” BMC Health Services Research 18, no. 1 (April 12, 2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3017-x.

Nakamura, Carolyn. “Mumbai’s Quiet Histories: Critical Intersections of the Urban Poor, Historical Struggles, and Heritage Spaces.” Journal of Social Archaeology 14, no. 3 (June 27, 2014): 271–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469605314539419.

Theobald, Sally, Rosemary Morgan, Kate Hawkins, Sarah Ssali, Asha George, and Sassy Molyneux. “The Importance of Gender Analysis in Research for Health Systems Strengthening.” Health Policy and Planning 32, no. suppl_5 (December 1, 2017): v1–3. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czx163.

Mehrotra, Surabhi, Ronita Bardhan, and Krithi Ramamritham. “Urban Informal Housing and Surface Urban Heat Island Intensity.” Environment and Urbanization ASIA 9, no. 2 (July 17, 2018): 158–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0975425318783548.

Vollmer, Nancy, Mansha Singh, Navika Harshe, and Joseph J. Valadez. “Does Interviewer Gender Influence a Mother’s Response to Household Surveys about Maternal and Child Health in Traditional Settings? A Qualitative Study in Bihar, India.” PLOS ONE 16, no. 6 (June 16, 2021). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252120.

Pagnani, Tiziana, Elisabetta Gotor, and Francesco Caracciolo. “Adaptive Strategies Enhance Smallholders’ Livelihood Resilience in Bihar, India.” Food Security 13, no. 2 (October 9, 2020): 419–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-020-01110-2.

Wang, Wenjing, Chuanrui Chen, and Lihua Li. “Research on the Differences in Basic Education Resources Allocation between Urban and Rural Areas from the Perspective of Educational Investment and Outcomes.” Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Pedagogy, Communication and Sociology (ICPCS 2019), 2019. https://doi.org/10.2991/icpcs-19.2019.47.

Harris, Andrew. “The Metonymic Urbanism of Twenty-First-Century Mumbai.” Urban Studies 49, no. 13 (September 7, 2012): 2955–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098012452458.

Sinha, Manjisha, and Sendhil Ramadas. “Correlates of Multidimensional Poverty in Rural Bihar.” Agricultural Economics Research Review 34, no. conf (2021): 51–57. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0279.2021.00014.8.

Patankar, Archana, Anand Patwardhan, Wijitbusaba Marome, and Emma Porio. “Impacts of Extreme Weather Events and Implications for Adaptation Planning for Coastal Cities.” APN Science Bulletin 3, no. 1 (2013): 16–24. https://doi.org/10.30852/sb.2013.16.

Acharya, Arun Kumar, and Parveen Nangia. “Population Growth and Changing Land-Use Pattern in Mumbai Metropolitan Region of India.” Caminhos de Geografia 5, no. 11 (February 8, 2004): 168–85. https://doi.org/10.14393/rcg51115332.

“The Comparative Study of Ownership Structure Effects (Mix and Concentration) on the Value of Companies Listed in Tehran Stock Exchange (Iran) and Bombay Stock Exchange (India).” International Journal of Advanced Studies in Humanities and Social Science 8, no. 1 (January 1, 2019): 91–103. https://doi.org/10.33945/sami/ijashss.2019.1.8.

Bhada, Perinaz, and Nickolas J. Themelis. “Potential for the First WTE Facility in Mumbai (Bombay) India.” 16th Annual North American Waste-to-Energy Conference, January 1, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1115/nawtec16-1930.

Dyson, Peter. “Slum Tourism: Representing and Interpreting ‘Reality’ in Dharavi, Mumbai.” Tourism Geographies 14, no. 2 (May 2012): 254–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2011.609900.

Dandona, Rakhi, Priyanka S Kochar, G Anil Kumar, and Lalit Dandona. “Use of Antiseptic for Cord Care and Its Association with Neonatal Mortality in a Population-Based Assessment in Bihar State, India.” BMJ Open 7, no. 1 (January 2017). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012436.

Salam, Md Abdus, Md Ejaz Anwer, and Md Safdar Alam. "Agriculture and the economy of Bihar: An analysis." Int. J. Sci. Res. Publ 3 (2013).

Singh, Shyama Nand, and Sudhanshu Kumar Jha. "Vikramshila university: Forgotten glory of ancient India." Journal of Indian research 5, no. 2 (2017): 43-49.

Imam, Shahid. "Population growth and urbanization in Bihar: A district level analysis." Int. J. Sci. Res 2020 (2020): 2319-7064.

Standard, Business. “India Needs Additional 2.4 MN Hospital Beds for Recommended Ratio: Report.” Business Standard, November 23, 2023. https://www.business-standard.com/industry/news/india-needs-additional-2-4-mn-hospital-beds-for-recommended-ratio-report-123112300873_1.html.

Punj, Shreya. “Seven Doctors per 1000 People; Maharashtra, Bihar Shares Worst Doctor-Patient Ratios.” mint, September 23, 2015. https://www.livemint.com/Politics/H2UjG9EQvo84em8xb8SCVJ/Seven-doctors-per-1000-people-Maharashtra-Bihar-shares-wor.html.

Dubey, Divyani. “Has India Really Achieved Who Recommended Doctor-Population Ratio?” Factchecker, August 3, 2022. https://www.factchecker.in/context-check/has-india-really-achieved-who-recommended-doctor-population-ratio-829064#google_vignette.

Pandrowala, Ambreen, Mukesh Desai, Manisha Madkaikar, Shilpa Kulkarni, Lakshmi Shobhavat, Jayashree Mishra, Shreepal Jain, et al. “Changing Outcomes of Stem Cell Transplantation in Primary Immunodeficiencies: Results from a Tertiary-Care Charitable Trust Hospital in Mumbai.” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: Global 2, no. 3 (August 2023): 100105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacig.2023.100105.

“Bihar Has 1,19,000 Doctors for 12 Crore Population: State Health Minister.” Hindustan Times, March 13, 2021. https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/bihar-has-1-19-000-doctors-for-12-crore-population-state-health-minister-101615647895778.html.

“In Bihar, There Is 1 Doctor for 17,685 People, Reveals State Health Minister in Assembly.” India Today, March 24, 2018. https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/one-doctor-for-17685-people-in-bihar-health-minister-1196943-2018-03-24.

Cai, Rebecca, Paul Novosad, Vaidehi Tandel, Sam Asher, and Anup Malani. “Representative Estimates of Covid-19 Infection Fatality Rates from Four Locations in India: Cross-Sectional Study.” BMJ Open 11, no. 10 (October 2021). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050920.

Dandona, Rakhi, G. Anil Kumar, Amit Kumar, Priyanka Singh, Sibin George, Mohammad Akbar, and Lalit Dandona. “Identification of Factors Associated with Stillbirth in the Indian State of Bihar Using Verbal Autopsy: A Population-Based Study.” PLOS Medicine 14, no. 8 (August 1, 2017). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002363

Kalra, Anika, Manju Siju, Alisa Jenny, Hilary Spindler, Solange Madriz, Jami Baayd, Seema Handu, Rakesh Ghosh, Susanna Cohen, and Dilys Walker. “Super Divya to the Rescue! Exploring Nurse Mentor Supervisor Perceptions on a Digital Tool to Support Learning and Engagement for Simulation Educators in Bihar, India.” BMC Medical Education 22, no. 1 (March 26, 2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03270-5.

Burger, Oskar, Faiz Hashmi, Maciej J. Dańko, Santosh Akhauri, Indrajit Chaudhuri, Emily Little, Hannah G. Lunkenheimer, et al. “Facilitating Behavioral Change: A Comparative Assessment of Asha Efficacy in Rural Bihar.” PLOS Global Public Health 2, no. 8 (August 17, 2022). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000756.

Mumbai Metro transforming transport: Contributing toward an equitable, safer, and Cleaner City, June 1, 2021. https://doi.org/10.22617/spr210179.

Dubey, Pooja P., and Prashant Borkar. “Review on Techniques for Traffic Jam Detection and Congestion Avoidance.” 2015 2nd International Conference on Electronics and Communication Systems (ICECS), February 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/ecs.2015.7124941.

Chakrabartty, Aparajita, and Sudakshina Gupta. “Traffic Congestion in the Metropolitan City of Kolkata.” Journal of Infrastructure Development 6, no. 1 (June 2014): 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974930614543046.

Gupta, Radhika. “There Must Be Some Way out of Here: Beyond a Spatial Conception of Muslim Ghettoization in Mumbai?” Ethnography 16, no. 3 (September 2015): 352–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138114552941.

Benzaken, Tami, Ashutosh H Palep, and Paramjit S Gill. “Exposure to and Opinions towards Sex Education among Adolescent Students in Mumbai: A Cross-Sectional Survey.” BMC Public Health 11, no. 1 (October 14, 2011). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-805.

Aslam, Monazza. “The Relative Effectiveness of Government and Private Schools in Pakistan: Are Girls Worse Off?” Education Economics 17, no. 3 (August 19, 2009): 329–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645290903142635.

Singh, Dr Ajad, Madhurendra Singh, Aditya Anand Karn, Tushar Kanti, and Khyati Shirolla. “Bihar’s Human Development Journey: A Post-1991 Exploration.” International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews 5, no. 1 (January 8, 2024): 1593–99. https://doi.org/10.55248/gengpi.5.0124.0217.

Kumar, Pragya, Shamshad Ahmad, Narottam Pradhan, Neha Chaudhary, Haripriya H, Sarita Kumari, Naveen K G, et al. Exploring the impact of the Jeevika Swasthya Mitra Helpdesk Intervention on improving healthcare access in tertiary healthcare facilities in Bihar: A qualitative descriptive evaluation., March 12, 2024. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3999162/v1.

Banerji, Rukmini. "Challenging Bihar on primary education." Economic and Political Weekly (2011): 33-39.

Kaur, Baljeet. “Disasters and Exemplified Vulnerabilities in a Cramped Public Health Infrastructure in India.” International Journal of Disaster Risk Management 2, no. 1 (2020): 15–22. https://doi.org/10.18485/ijdrm.2020.2.1.2.

Balarajan, Y, S Selvaraj, and SV Subramanian. “Health Care and Equity in India.” The Lancet 377, no. 9764 (February 2011): 505–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61894-6.

" Banerjee, Shreya. “Determinants of Rural-Urban Differential in Healthcare Utilization among the Elderly Population in India.” BMC Public Health 21, no. 1 (May 17, 2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10773-1.

"

ahmed, Shakeel. “SDG on Health and Socio-Economic Barriers: An Empirical Study in Bihar.” International Journal of Social Sciences 11, no. 4 (December 25, 2023). https://doi.org/10.46852/2249-6637.04.2022.2.

Madriz, Solange, Patience Afulani, Hilary Spindler, Rakesh Ghosh, Nidhi Subramaniam, Tanmay Mahapatra, Aritra Das, et al. “Training Nurse Simulation Educators at Scale to Improve Maternal and Newborn Health: A Case Study from Bihar, India.” BMC Medical Education 22, no. 1 (December 15, 2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03911-9.

Duvendack, Maren, and Lina Sonne. “Responding to the Multifaceted COVID-19 Crisis: The Case of Mumbai, India.” Progress in Development Studies 21, no. 4 (August 9, 2021): 361–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/14649934211030449.

Karvande, Shilpa, Devendra Sonawane, Sandeep Chavan, and Nerges Mistry. “What Does Quality of Care Mean for Maternal Health Providers from Two Vulnerable States of India? Case Study of Bihar and Jharkhand.” Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition 35, no. 1 (February 20, 2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41043-016-0043-3.

Patel, Parisa, Mahua Das, and Utpal Das. “The Perceptions, Health-Seeking Behaviours and Access of Scheduled Caste Women to Maternal Health Services in Bihar, India.” Reproductive Health Matters 26, no. 54 (November 7, 2018): 114–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/09688080.2018.1533361.

Gupta, Dr. Renu. “Evaluation of the Status of Health Infrastructure in India with Special Reference to Bihar & Jharkhand.” International Journal of Social Science and Economic Research 08, no. 12 (2023): 3974–82. https://doi.org/10.46609/ijsser.2023.v08i12.019.

Singh, Sanjeev, Damodar Sahu, Ashish Agrawal, Lakshmanan Jeyaseelan, Ambily Nadaraj, and Meeta Dhaval Vashi. “Coverage, Quality, and Correlates of Childhood Immunization in Slums under National Immunization Program of India: A Cross-Sectional Study.” Heliyon 5, no. 9 (September 2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02403.

Bekele, Chalachew, Delayehu Bekele, Bezawit Mesfin Hunegnaw, Kimiko Van Wickle, Fanos Ashenafi Gebremeskel, Michelle Korte, Christine Tedijanto, Lisanu Taddesse, and Grace J Chan. “Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Utilisation of Facility-Based Essential Maternal and Child Health Services from March to August 2020 Compared with Pre-Pandemic March–August 2019: A Mixed-Methods Study in North Shewa Zone, Ethiopia.” BMJ Open 12, no. 6 (June 2022). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059408.

Kumar, G Anil, Rakhi Dandona, Priyanka Chaman, Priyanka Singh, and Lalit Dandona. “A Population-Based Study of Neonatal Mortality and Maternal Care Utilization in the Indian State of Bihar.” BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 14, no. 1 (October 17, 2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-357.

Teleayo, Anuoluwaop. “Assessing the Impact of Universal Healthcare Coverage on Maternal and Child Health Outcomes in Nigeria.” Journal of Community Health Provision 3, no. 1 (May 2, 2023): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.55885/jchp.v3i1.219.

Abhay B, Mane, and Khandekar Sanjay V. “India?S Ageing Population: Geriatric Care Still in Infancy.” Journal of Gerontology & Geriatric Research 03, no. 05 (2014). https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-7182.1000186.

Valerie Tang, K.L. Choy, Paul K.Y. Siu, H.Y. Lam, G.T.S. Ho, and Stephen W.Y. Cheng. “An Intelligent Performance Assessment System for Enhancing the Service Quality of Home Care Nursing Staff in the Healthcare Industry.” 2016 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), September 2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/picmet.2016.7806657.

Honda, Trenton J., Andrzej Kozikowski, Freddi Segal-Gidan, and Roderick Hooker. Physician assistants in geriatric medicine, July 25, 2020. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-23572/v2.

Wan, HC, and KS Chin. “Exploring Internet of Healthcare Things for Establishing an Integrated Care Link System in the Healthcare Industry.” International Journal of Engineering Business Management 13 (January 1, 2021): 184797902110195. https://doi.org/10.1177/18479790211019526.

Naydenova, Elina, Arvind Raghu, Johanna Ernst, Sirazul A. Sahariah, Meera Gandhi, and Georgina Murphy. “Healthcare Choices in Mumbai Slums: A Cross-Sectional Study.” Wellcome Open Research 2 (July 6, 2018): 115. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.13127.2.

Sharma, Rohit, and Peter Newman. “Can Land Value Capture Make PPP’s Competitive in Fares? A Mumbai Case Study.” Transport Policy 64 (May 2018): 123–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.02.002.

Kamath, Sagarika, Rajesh Kamath, and Brayal D’Souza. “An Assessment of the Public Healthcare Infrastructure Deficiency in a District of Bihar State of India.” Postgraduate Medical Journal 93, no. 1105 (July 17, 2017): 710–11. https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2017-135065.

Rokicki, Tomasz, Aleksandra Perkowska, and Marcin Ratajczak. “Differentiation in Healthcare Financing in EU Countries.” Sustainability 13, no. 1 (December 29, 2020): 251. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010251.

Fasseeh, Ahmad, Baher ElEzbawy, Wessam Adly, Rawda ElShahawy, Mohsen George, Sherif Abaza, Amr ElShalakani, and Zoltán Kaló. “Healthcare Financing in Egypt: A Systematic Literature Review.” Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association 97, no. 1 (January 7, 2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42506-021-00089-8.

Biswas, Rathin, Kavi Arya, and Shankar Deshpande. “More Toilet Infrastructures Do Not Nullify Open Defecation: A Perspective from Squatter Settlements in Megacity Mumbai.” Applied Water Science 10, no. 4 (March 19, 2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-020-1169-4.

Jayaprasad, Niniya, Priyanka Borhade, Christopher LeBoa, Kashmira Date, Shrikrishna 5 Joshi, Rahul Shimpi, Jason R. Andrews, Stephen P. Luby, and Seth A. Hoffman. “Retrospective Review of Blood Culture-Confirmed Cases of Enteric Fever in Navi Mumbai, India: 2014–2018.” The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 109, no. 3 (September 6, 2023): 571–74. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.23-0102.

Patwardhan, Maitreyee, Shang-Ju Li, Dipika Khushalani, Harshwardhan Dere, and Shripad Desai. The type of Health Service Utilization in Mumbai slums including Mobile Health Services: A community based survey, July 25, 2022. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1844418/v1.

Grafe, Fritz-Julius. “Finance, Water Infrastructure, and the City: Comparing Impacts of Financialization in London and Mumbai.” Regional Studies, Regional Science 7, no. 1 (January 1, 2020): 214–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2020.1778515.

Toritsemogba Tosanbami Omaghomi, Jeremiah Olawumi Arowoogun, Opeoluwa Akomolafe, Ifeoma Pamela Odilibe, and Oluwafunmi Adijat Elufioye. “Telemedicine in Rural Africa: A Review of Accessibility and Impact.” World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews 21, no. 2 (February 28, 2023): 421–31. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.21.2.0475.

Kustwar, Raj Kishor, and Suman Ray. “EHealth and Telemedicine in India: An Overview on the Health Care Need of the People.” Journal of Multidisciplinary Research in Healthcare 6, no. 2 (July 2020): 25–36. https://doi.org/10.15415/jmrh.2020.62004.

Youngson, Nicole, Michael Saxton, Peter G. Jaffe, Deborah Chiodo, Myrna Dawson, and Anna-Lee Straatman. “Challenges in Risk Assessment with Rural Domestic Violence Victims: Implications for Practice.” Journal of Family Violence 36, no. 5 (February 9, 2021): 537–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-021-00248-7.

Amri, Siskawati, and Jonhariono Sihotang. “Impact of Poverty Reduction Programs on Healthcare Access in Remote AR-EAS: Fostering Community Development for Sustainable Health.” Law and Economics 17, no. 3 (October 30, 2023): 170–85. https://doi.org/10.35335/laweco.v17i3.43.